Cloud comparisons are useful only when readers can trust the order, labels, and recommendations. This policy explains how getInfra.cloud keeps provider coverage, rankings, reviews, and pricing tables independent from paid influence.
getInfra.cloud exists to help Indian developers, founders, infrastructure teams, and technology buyers compare cloud options with less confusion. The site tracks VPS, GPU cloud, object storage, provider details, Indian data centre coverage, and pricing signals across Indian and global providers.
The comparison order is not sold. Provider labels are not rented. Review conclusions are not written by providers. When a page highlights a provider, plan, warning, or limitation, that judgement must come from public data, documented methodology, visible pricing, or clearly stated editorial reasoning.
Providers cannot pay to appear higher in pricing tables, provider lists, comparison pages, or guides.
Provider order does not depend on referrals, commissions, lead payouts, or commercial partnerships.
Pricing and provider details should trace back to official pages, calculators, documentation, or disclosed source notes.
Some cloud comparison sites change visibility based on affiliate income, paid campaigns, or partner programmes. getInfra.cloud takes the opposite approach. Commercial influence should not decide which cloud looks affordable, suitable, or reliable.
| Item | Policy | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Provider ranking | Not for sale | Readers should see providers ranked by data, category fit, public pricing, and India relevance. |
| Review verdicts | Not provider-written | Pros, watch-outs, and suitability notes must reflect editorial judgement, not marketing copy. |
| Badges and labels | Not rented | Labels such as GPU Available, Enterprise, Indian, or Startup Friendly should describe real product signals. |
| Pricing placement | Not sponsored | A plan should not appear cheaper or more prominent because a provider pays for visibility. |
| Comparison outcome | Not negotiated | A side-by-side page must show strengths and limitations even when a provider disagrees. |
Simple rule: if a change would make a provider look better without a supporting source or clear editorial reason, it does not belong on getInfra.cloud.
Provider order can change by page type. A low-cost VPS table may sort by monthly price. A GPU page may prioritise public GPU pricing, accelerator availability, and India access. A provider directory may use coverage depth, available public data, and India relevance.
The ranking logic should be visible or obvious from the page context. When a table is sortable, users should be able to change the order based on their own priorities, such as price, region, RAM, GPU type, provider category, or support needs.
Usually sorted by relevant cost signals such as monthly VPS price, hourly GPU price, billing basis, or like-for-like plan category.
May consider category coverage, public pricing visibility, Indian regions, GPU support, and depth of verified provider information.
Should compare both providers on the same dimensions, including price, regions, support, SLA, service coverage, and known limitations.
Recommendations should be based on use case fit, workload needs, data location, budget, compliance context, and public evidence.
getInfra.cloud may need sustainable revenue to operate, but revenue should never decide provider order or editorial conclusions. If the site later uses advertising, sponsorship, donations, or other monetisation, those relationships should be disclosed clearly and kept separate from comparison logic.
Display advertising, reader donations, newsletter sponsorship, or clearly separated brand ads may be acceptable when they do not change rankings, reviews, labels, or comparison results.
Paid provider ranking, hidden affiliate links, sponsored verdicts, provider-written reviews, undisclosed lead generation, or changing comparison outcomes for commercial reasons.
Any paid placement, sponsored content, or advertising relationship must be labelled in a way that readers can understand before making a cloud buying decision.
Providers can contact getInfra.cloud to report outdated pricing, missing plans, incorrect company information, unsupported claims, or changed service availability. Provider feedback is useful, but it does not automatically become published content.
Accepted when supported by official pricing pages, product documentation, public announcements, or verifiable provider evidence.
Reviewed carefully. Claims about uptime, GPU availability, performance, certifications, or compliance need reliable support.
May be rewritten or excluded. getInfra.cloud should use clear buyer-focused language, not provider-controlled copy.
If a provider disputes a comparison, the page may be reviewed, corrected, clarified, or left unchanged depending on evidence.
Provider access does not mean provider control. Providers can help us correct facts, but they cannot approve, block, or rewrite independent conclusions.
When commercial, editorial, or data limitations exist, they should be visible. The goal is not to make every page longer. The goal is to make important context clear before a reader compares providers or shortlists a cloud service.
Used when pricing can be traced to an official public pricing page, calculator, documentation page, or provider announcement.
Used when a USD price is converted to INR, a monthly equivalent is calculated, or a plan needs assumptions to compare fairly.
Used for editorial content where provider placement, verdict, or comparison outcome is not paid or provider-approved.
Used because cloud pricing changes often. Readers should confirm final price and terms on the provider website.
Report any pricing error, unclear disclosure, or possible independence issue. We review every useful correction.
Contact getInfra.cloud → View Corrections Policy →Browse providers, pricing tables, and comparison pages with clear source notes, visible assumptions, and independent editorial rules.