Meet the people and editorial roles behind getInfra.cloud's cloud pricing research, provider profiles, comparison pages and India-focused infrastructure guides.
getInfra.cloud publishes cloud pricing comparisons, provider profiles, GPU cloud research, buyer guides, and India-focused infrastructure notes. This page explains who prepares that content, which editorial roles support the work, and how information is checked before publication.
Cloud infrastructure decisions require clear, reliable, and accountable information. The author and reviewer information below helps readers understand the experience behind the research, the source review process, and the limits of each published comparison.
getInfra.cloud lists named contributors where appropriate, but the page is designed as a platform-level trust page. Public profiles support author transparency; pricing and provider claims are still checked against official provider sources, methodology rules, and correction workflows.
The author page should not read like a personal portfolio. It should show a clear editorial structure. These are the roles used across getInfra.cloud content.
Prepares the main explanation, page structure, provider summaries, comparison notes, and buyer-focused guidance.
Checks official pricing pages, calculator outputs, plan specs, GPU rates, currency assumptions, and source dates.
Reviews clarity, neutrality, source labels, disclaimers, provider influence risks, and correction requirements before updates go live.
Daya Shankar contributes as the lead author and maintainer for getInfra.cloud. His background as a developer, AI and machine learning enthusiast, and cloud infrastructure researcher helps shape the platform's pricing comparisons, provider profiles, GPU cloud notes, and India-focused buyer guides.
His profile is included for transparency, but getInfra.cloud content is not based on personal preference. Provider and pricing claims are checked against official sources, review rules, and correction processes documented across the site.
heydaya.github.io
Personal portfolio and project hub used as a public identity and developer background signal.
github.com/heydaya
Public code profile supporting developer background and technical project visibility.
medium.com/@daya-shankar
Technical writing profile connected to cloud, GPU, Kubernetes, storage, scaling, and infrastructure topics.
huggingface.co/daya-shankar
AI community profile used as a signal of interest in AI, LLM tools, and open-source model activity.
quora.com/profile/Daya-S-50
Public Q&A profile included for broader author identity and community presence.
x.com/ImdayaOfficial
Public social profile for author discovery, professional presence, and occasional updates.
getInfra.cloud covers cloud providers, pricing, GPUs, storage, data centres, and managed services. These expertise areas combine developer experience, technical publishing, AI/ML interest, source review, and practical cloud research workflows.
Comparing VPS plans, GPU instances, storage categories, bandwidth, regions, billing models, and provider-level differences.
Researching H100, H200, A100, L40S, inference workloads, model training needs, and GPU cloud pricing trade-offs.
Developer background helps with page structure, front-end implementation, data presentation, UX clarity, and technical explainers.
Focusing on INR pricing, India data centres, Indian provider availability, startup use cases, and local buyer concerns.
| Content Area | Responsibility | Supporting Page |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing tables | Collect plan details, verify official sources, normalise specs, apply INR conversion notes, and flag uncertain pricing. | Methodology |
| Provider profiles | Summarise services, regions, GPU availability, data centre coverage, strengths, watch-outs, and source limitations. | Data sources |
| Buyer guides | Explain infrastructure buying decisions in plain language without pushing any provider unfairly. | Editorial policy |
| Corrections | Review reported issues, verify evidence, update affected pages, and log meaningful pricing changes. | Corrections |
Research starts with official provider pages, pricing calculators, public product documentation, region pages, press releases, or provider support responses.
Plan details are converted into a consistent comparison format, including vCPU, RAM, storage, bandwidth, currency, region, and billing model.
The page is checked for unclear labels, outdated assumptions, exaggerated claims, missing disclaimers, and provider influence risks.
After publishing, pages are monitored through scheduled updates, reader feedback, provider correction requests, and periodic changelog reviews.
Every important pricing page, provider page, and buyer guide should show who created it, who reviewed the data, and when it was last updated.
Use this for the person who prepared the main content, explanation, and page structure.
Use this for the check against pricing pages, source links, regions, and provider specifications.
Use this for the latest meaningful content, source, pricing, or methodology update.
Written by Daya Shankar · Data reviewed against official provider sources · Last updated June 2026 · Methodology: getInfra.cloud/methodology/
Cloud providers can help correct factual errors, but they cannot control rankings, comparison labels, verdicts, or editorial conclusions.
Use the editorial contact for author questions, correction requests, provider source updates, missing attribution, or unclear methodology notes.
Wrong price, stale plan, missing source, or unclear provider data.
[email protected]Send updated bios, contributor links, credentials, or publishing history.
[email protected]Raise concerns about bias, attribution, ranking labels, or unclear methodology.
[email protected]Public profiles are included as author transparency signals, not as substitutes for source verification.
Review how getInfra.cloud handles sources, methodology, corrections, and editorial independence.
Methodology → Editorial Policy →See how getInfra.cloud collects pricing data, reviews cloud provider claims, handles corrections, and keeps comparisons independent.